A government minister has broken ranks with his colleagues in the Council of Ministers to call for a new ‘progressive’ kind of politics.
But Phil Gawne’s comments have been rubbished as
‘idealistic dreaming’ and ‘electioneering’ by the Chief Minister.
Infrastructure minister and Rushen MHK Mr Gawne last week announced his platform of ‘progressive politics for a progressive island’, saying that people feel disillusioned with politicians and the process of decision making.
Mr Gawne, a long-standing nationalist, is calling for the island to be given greater autonomy and for the people to be given a greater say in the decisions that affect them.
He wants to enlist the support of like-minded individuals and has not ruled out the creation of a new political party.
He told the Examiner: ‘I’ve reached a conclusion that I don’t want to stand at the next general election unless I feel we can make more democratic change, both constitutional reform but also developing a more progressive, inclusive democracy so people feel more involved in decision-making.’
Mr Gawne said that across the western world people have become disillusioned with conventional mainstream politics and this is reflected in the Isle of Man too.
He cites Yellowknife, Canada, as an example of the how things could change.
Here there has been an innovative move to ‘crowdsource’ democracy, with a group of candidates in the city elections pledging to vote on controversial issues according to users of their IserveU website. Replicated here, Mr Gawne believes e-democracy would go some way to giving people a voice in decision-making.
He accepts government does regularly consult over policy issues but he adds: ‘They are just that - consultations - they are not referenda. People feel a little aggrieved if the overwhelming number of voters ask for one thing then government does something else.’
Ironic then, that he and his department seemingly did just that with the plans for a replacement Old Laxey Bridge. Most villagers favoured one design but the DoI chose another.
As part of his push for direct democracy, however, Mr Gawne has invited the people of Laxey to contact him with their views on the bridge, and has pledged to change his department’s plans if that is their will.
He said: ‘This is a classic example. We did do a consultation. It wasn’t perfect - I agree we should have done it better. If the majority of the population of Laxey write in to me by next Friday saying we really don’t like the scheme then we will pull it and look at it again.’
Mr Gawne says the island needs greater autonomy but moves toward constitutional reform have ‘ground to a shuddering halt’ over the last four and a half years.
He says the VAT agreement is far less lucrative than it was but it would be possible to have more autonomy while not breaking that agreement. Equally, he believes the island can find other ways of generating income without the VAT revenue sharing deal, and fiscal autonomy could actually boost the economy.
Mr Gawne says he wants to forge a new coalition or alliance of like-minded people.
He said: ‘I’m not standing if I don’t feel there’s enough support to do something more progressive in the next five years. What I’m looking for is the support of individual parties. Anyone who wants to email me or contact me through social media I would be interested to hear from them. I want to see what level of interest there is out there.
‘If a lot of people say they want to stand and all believe pretty much the same things then we could form a party. Let’s see what happens.’
Chief Minister Allan Bell is dismissive. He said: ‘Mr Gawne’s political viewpoint has been well-known for a great many years. I think he is using this opportunity to kickstart his election campaign.
‘He had not given me any indication he was going to make this statement. It’s disappointing that he makes reference to what appears to be disillusionment within CoMin. Any minister has absolute freedom to raise any issue they want for further discussion.’
He said the VAT arrangement was ‘absolutely fundamental’ to the island’s ‘fiscal well-being’ and losing it or any further part of it would be ‘disastrous’.
Of Mr Gawne’s views on autonomy, Mr Bell said: ‘It’s idealistic dreaming at this point in time.
‘I don’t want to see the Isle of Man independent but bankrupt.’