HERITAGE railway bosses have defended plans to spend £400,000 on a replacement diesel loco from Eastern Europe - claiming it will pay for itself in 13 years and help make savings of almost £40,000 a year.
Community Culture and Leisure Minister Tim Crookall admitted the original proposals to design and build a new engine were hard to justify in the current financial climate.
He said the cheapest alternative option ‘by far’ was to buy a full-refurbished 30-year-old Romanian-built L45H diesel, which if Tynwald approval was given at next month’s sitting of the court, could be delivered in about 18 months’ time.
The Minister said he would be asking Tynwald for approval to spend £350,000 of capital funds in addition to the £50,000 that had previously been agreed for the design of a new diesel.
He said: ‘I have explained the key facts to members of Tynwald already so that we can have an informed debate and now wish to do the same for the public. Using a five per cent cost of capital, we calculate that the loco will pay for itself in 13 years. Annual savings will be almost £40,000. With a minimum life of 20 years this proposal is one that makes good financial sense.’
Public transport director Ian Longworth insisted that only 20 per cent of visitors to the line were diehard enthusiasts or interested in railways - for the remaining 80 per cent ‘steam engines are not the main attraction’.
He explained that the two second hand diesel locos currently on the railway had a destructive effect on the track. One was geared up to travel at four miles a hour and the other was a shunting engine built for a different gauge.
Purchase of a ‘main line’ diesel would allow it to be used to recover broken down trains, bank heavy trains, shunt carriages and provide a speedier response to lineside fires.
It would help reduce running costs by eliminating the need to have a spare locomotive in steam and would be available to pull works trains and potentially also be used for a commuter service which is not currently considered viable using a steam engine.
Mr Longworth said the type of diesel proposed to be purchased was designed to run on a range of different gauges so could be altered easily to run on the Steam Railway’s 3ft track.
But to fit the line’s tight loading gauges, the engine would need drastic modifications. It would be ‘cut off’ at the underframe, a new transmission unit fitted and two lower cabs fitted at each end. These works would be carried out in Romania or Hungary but a new air brake system would be fitted after delivery to the island.
Mr Longworth was asked whether a cheaper alternative would have been a engine from the 3ft gauge Bord na Mona peat railways in Ireland. But he said such engines were too light for the Steam Railway’s purposes.
Chief executive of the DCCL Nick Black said he understood public concerns about spending this sort of money at a time when public services were being cut. But he said the department had responded to those concerns by coming up with an alternative that was half the cost of a new engine.
The Minister said that since the failure of the Viking diesel, it had not been possible to recover passengers or fulfil the timetable when steam locos have failed in service. ‘This isn’t an unusual occurrence. We have a long record of repairing what we already have but there comes a point when that’s no longer sensible or even possible. By reducing the specification to the bare minimum and identifying a second-hand loco with a new engine and transmission we’re confident we’ve found a cost-effective way to meet our needs.’