Manx electricity generation remains mired in an expensive, fossil-fuelled, debt-laden past. It denies customers access to clean, modern renewable energy – secure in both supply and price terms. Cat Turner looks at what’s happening in Europe
--------------------------
On July 15, the EU announced its ‘summer package’ of energy reforms.
It’s aiming to get a balance between meeting peoples’ needs, delivering new technology benefits and encouraging investment.
It’s a stark reminder of how far the island is behind in terms of new, low-carbon technologies – but even more so on the subject of how Manx taxpayers and billpayers are treated by our government on energy matters, compared with the EU.
The European Commission proposes a ‘new deal’ for energy consumers, based on three ‘pillars’:
– consumer empowerment;
– smart homes and networks;
– data management and protection (that is, making sure people’s personal data gathered for energy management purposes isn’t misused).
That whole idea of ‘consumer empowerment’ doesn’t even get discussed here in the island, but it should.
We taxpayers and bill-payers – owners, ultimately, of our electricity infrastructure – shouldn’t have to pay through the nose for past planning mistakes through a costly commitment to last-century, over-capacity plant.
In most countries, it’s accepted that customers have the right to choose clean energy, whether self-generated, commercially or community-generated.
That choice is denied to us because we’re constrained by the legacy of past decisions – the Electricity Act doesn’t allow for the establishment of community power networks, which would compete with Manx Utilities Authority.
Community renewables just aren’t an option here, but they are in the EU and UK – in ways which give people choice in their power sourcing and usage.
Such schemes can also cut true costs hugely, since the fossil-fuelled power industry’s subsidies – as readers of this column will know – dwarf those of the renewables industries.
The EU says it aims to put consumers at the centre of a ‘thriving and functioning energy system’. Wouldn’t it be wonderful, as customers, to feel similarly valued here?.
Its summer package is made up of proposals on:
– redesigning the electricity market;
– the new deal for energy consumers;
– revising energy labelling rules;
– revising the EU Emissions Trading System, so as to help meet CO2 reduction targets.
As part of all this, it’s promoting things like smart grids, smart metering, smart-homes, self-generation and storage to help people take ownership, use technology to cut bills and participate actively in the market.
Some options (mostly demand management) are open to us in the island, and hats off to MUA for promoting them where they are, but it’s nowhere near enough, and energy worries are a real constraint for many families and businesses.
And discussions on choice as to cleaner sources of power are largely completely off the table, of course.
So, back to the EU. The Commission’s strategy includes:
– empowering consumers. In part this means clearer billing so customers can understand the components of energy prices and bills. They should also have easy access to real or near-time consumption data so they can change behaviour and save energy.
– and crucially, explicitly, giving consumers a wide choice of action. This includes helping them cut bills through local and microgeneration from renewables, for power and for heat. It also helps a country’s energy security, since many small sources make for far more resilience in the face of disasters than does reliance on a small number of generators.
In this day, power is almost as much as a ‘hygiene factor’ for a decent standard of living as are clean water or good quality health services.
The means of generating, distributing and charging for power is fundamental to our way of life – and needs special scrutiny in a monopoly, albeit one owned ultimately by the public.
But we seem to have been lulled into submissiveness on this most crucial of issues.
Isn’t it time we took part in a proper public discussion about fairness, good value and planning for our energy future?