The residents of Peel are awaiting recommendations on a controversial development in the town.
A planning appeal hearing was held in Douglas last week about a proposal by developer Heritage Homes to build 144 houses at Reayrt ny Cronk.
Commissioner Ian Davison, town clerk Peter Leadley and Peel resident Trevor Cowin lodged appeals at Thursday’s hearing.
The scheme has been approved by the government’s planning department but has been met with anger by many of the town’s residents and most of Peel’s commissioners, who lodged the appeal against the plan’s approval.
A public meeting was called last week with around 150 people attending, and more than 130 of them voting against the development.
Heritage Homes has said that the development will create 150 jobs.
As last week’s Manx Independent reported, there was a lively public meeting on Monday last week about the proposal before the planning appeal hearing, when the overwhelming majority of people who attended opposed the plans.
Developer Heritage Homes was represented by Ciaran Downey, its housing director, although he was there in a private capacity because the company hadn’t been officially invited.
Speaking first for the commissioners at the planning appeal was Mr Leadley, who said: ‘The island’s Strategic Plan for the west states only 1,000 new dwellings should be built between 2001 and 2016. Previous applications have gone over this amount and described it as a “small surplus”. It is substantial in our view.’
Talking about the public open space requirements for the development, Mr Leadley said: ‘The planning report talks about the QEII School, Peel Golf Club, Peel Beach, the Headlands, the whole of the town. You can’t use a whole town as open space. The golf club is a private club, there’s no access to that unless you pay a fee.’
Mr Leadley also mentioned traffic congestion, policing of the town and drainage problems.
‘Thirty-three per cent of the planning committee objected to this decision so it was by no means unanimous. The town has reached its limit,’ he said.
Mr Davison also spoke about the open space and sewage issues asking: ‘How much extra pollution will go into Peel bay?’
‘If this goes ahead we will be 27 per cent over the agreed 1,000 dwellings. Well over.
‘The headmistress at the school has said she’d be unable to cope – who will be using the school as public open space? There are problems already with drug dealers. I have concerns over paedophiles and grooming.
‘At the Clothworkers’ School they had to turn the staff room into a classroom. This year’s figures have been manipulated.
‘Why do they feel they can use the golf club as open space? The club secretary wasn’t consulted – they are angry. It’s a surprise the cemetary was missed out on this occasion!
‘It takes two weeks to get a doctor appointment as it is. One hundred and forty-four houses will bring around 600 more people.
‘There will be more burden on the police. We need to say no at this time – we don’t have the infrastructure to cope, we need to catch up, it makes it more difficult. We’d like to get ahead with our services.’
Representing Heritage Homes, Vincent Fraser said: ‘The 1,000 figure is a guideline rather than a limit. The commissioners have accepted that in the past. I suggest there isn’t any opposition from public bodies because of a lack of infrastructure – the Department of Education haven’t come.
‘The Strategic Plan allows us to count school playing fields.’
Mr Davison answered: ‘The problem is 75 per cent of the time they’re taken up by the school or clubs. They’re only available in the dark.
‘Am I entitled to set my deckchair on the goal line during a rugby match? I don’t know.
‘At present the infrastructure and resources of the community are stretched, any increase will make life much harder.
‘It’s the public’s opinion that this is too large. I would have preferred a smaller development.
‘I would ask planning to help the commissioners and say no to a development of this size at this time.’
Planning officer Sarah Corlett said that the application was made almost a year ago and only two responses were initially received, one against it from Mr Cowin and another from former commissioner Neil Cushing, who ‘welcomed the development’.
Mr Cowin argued that there had been a material impact to him and his neighbours after the last development with noise and traffic increasing.
Evidence was also heard from Bryan Hall, a consultant civil and transportation planning engineer, and David Humphreys, planning director for Heritage Homes.
Planning inspector Alan Langton said that there is still 35 hectares of land in the west designated for housing but subject to applications.
Mr Langton will now write to Infrastructure Minister Phil Gawne MHK with his recommendations before a decision is announced.
Decisions can take around four weeks to be published.