A mental health nurse who hugged a patient moments after they discussed intimate sexual fantasies has been suspended for six months.
Michael Oakes admitted offering the embrace because of the ‘depth and gravity’ of the patient’s disclosure.
The patient, a farmer who was a cross-dresser, confessed to sexual fantasies involving Oakes, prompting the nurse to transfer him to another practitioner at the island’s Department of Social Care.
But three years later Oakes allowed the man to stay and drink alcohol at his home.
He then performed a deep-heat massage on the patient, the Nursing and Midwifery Council this week heard at Old Bailey in London.
The nurse had offered to hug the farmer after he opened up about his sexuality during a home visit in November 2009.
Oakes said when he (Oakes) came out as gay all he wanted was a hug.
He described it as a ‘clear’ way of reassuring the patient he would be OK.
He accepted Patient A back into his care in March 2012, three years after he had transferred the man to another practitioner.
He stayed at Oakes’ home between May and June 2012, the hearing was told.
Suspending Oakes from the profession for six months, NMC panel chair Paul Powici said: ‘Taken collectively, the panel considered that your actions did amount to breaches of the code, because they showed multiple errors in judgement.
‘In these circumstances, the panel was satisfied that, taken together, your actions fell short of what would be considered as proper in the circumstances.
‘In your statement, you admit that you failed to maintain professional boundaries with Patient A and that you had a lapse of judgement which you regret in relation to your allowing Patient A to consume alcohol in your home and sleep at your home.
‘You accept that you did not document the reason for Patient A being reassigned, and stated that you would, in the future, ensure there is a clear and contemporaneous record.
‘The panel found your actions amounted to misconduct.
‘You did not disclose that Patient A had been staying at your home, and this involved a degree of dishonesty, a breach of one of the fundamental tenets of the code.
‘You accept that you did not document the reasons why Patient A had been reassigned, and that this was a failure on your behalf.
The panel considered that this put Patient A at risk of harm due to his wide-ranging vulnerability.’
Oakes was found to have failed to maintain professional boundaries with Patient A.
A charge of using excessive force to restrain a patient at Lytham Court Care Home, Lytham St Annes, Lancashire, was found not proved.
Oakes was suspended from the profession for six months.